Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
67 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-855mm (F3.0-6.5) lens
- 538g - 114 x 89 x 96mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon L830
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Nikon. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and L840 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX200 IS was introduced 6 years prior to the L840 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Nikon L840 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the SX200 IS grades versus the L840 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Nikon Coolpix L840. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Nikon L840 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon L840
| SX200 IS | L840 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon L840 over the Canon SX200 IS
| L840 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon L840
| SX200 IS | L840 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Nikon L840 has proportions of 114mm x 89mm x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") having a weight of 538 grams (1.19 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the L840.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and L840 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and L840.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon L840 to provide extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon L840 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix L840 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix L840 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 23-855mm (37.2x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 7.4fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 538g (1.19 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 114 x 89 x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 590 pictures |
| Battery format | - | AA |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SC/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $329 | $400 |