Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Nikon S9300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the S9100 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX200 IS was released 3 years earlier than the S9100 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SX200 IS matches up against the S9100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Nikon Coolpix S9100. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Nikon S9100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon S9100
| SX200 IS | S9100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Canon SX200 IS
| S9100 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 | May 2009 | Newer by 26 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon S9100
| SX200 IS | S9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS comes with physical dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9100 has proportions of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the S9100.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and S9100 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and S9100.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you should always take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $329 |