Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2017
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon W300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Nikon. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and W300 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX200 IS was unveiled 9 years earlier than the W300 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SX200 IS matches up against the W300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Nikon Coolpix W300. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon W300
| SX200 IS | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Canon SX200 IS
| W300 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 97 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon W300
| SX200 IS | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS comes with exterior measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Nikon W300 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon W300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the W300.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and W300 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and W300.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Nikon W300 to deliver greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 231 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 280 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Built-in |
| Battery model | NB-5L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $329 | $387 |