Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and SH-50 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX200 IS was revealed 4 years prior to the SH-50 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX200 IS scores against the SH-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Olympus SH-50. The full galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus SH-50
| SX200 IS | SH-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Canon SX200 IS
| SH-50 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SH-50
| SX200 IS | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-50 has dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX200 IS and the SH-50.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and SH-50 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and SH-50.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-50 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SH-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SH-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $300 |