Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX200 IS was brought out 4 months later than the SP-565UZ which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SX200 IS grades versus the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| SX200 IS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Canon SX200 IS
| SP-565UZ | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SP-565UZ
| SX200 IS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS has physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SX200 IS versus the SP-565UZ.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and SP-565UZ is 90 and 72 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The graphic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and SP-565UZ.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX200 IS to provide more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $400 |