Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX200 IS was revealed 8 months prior to the SP-600 UZ so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX200 IS matches up against the SP-600 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The full galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
SX200 IS | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Canon SX200 IS
SP-600 UZ | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | May 2009 | More recent by 8 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SP-600 UZ
SX200 IS | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS has physical dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX200 IS vs the SP-600 UZ.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and SP-600 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and SP-600 UZ.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of images although you need to take the age of the cameras into account. The older SX200 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-5L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $329 | $189 |