Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Following is a complete review of the Canon SX200 IS versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX200 IS was introduced 8 months prior to the SP-800 UZ and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX200 IS matches up versus the SP-800 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| SX200 IS | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Canon SX200 IS
| SP-800 UZ | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 | May 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| SX200 IS | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS offers outside measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS against the SP-800 UZ.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and SP-800 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and SP-800 UZ.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SP-800 UZ to provide you with more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 12 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $329 | $270 |