Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 550WP
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the 550WP (10MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX200 IS was released 5 months after the 550WP so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the SX200 IS matches up vs the 550WP in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Olympus Stylus 550WP. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus 550WP
SX200 IS | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Canon SX200 IS
550WP | SX200 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus 550WP
SX200 IS | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2009 | January 2009 | Similar generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS has got outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus 550WP has sizing of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the 550WP.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and 550WP is 90 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and 550WP.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon SX200 IS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
Also called as | - | mju 550WP |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 7cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-5L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $329 | $399 |