Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 7040
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Canon SX200 IS versus Olympus 7040, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the 7040 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX200 IS was introduced 7 months earlier than the 7040 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the SX200 IS grades against the 7040 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Olympus Stylus 7040. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Olympus 7040 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus 7040
| SX200 IS | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Canon SX200 IS
| 7040 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus 7040
| SX200 IS | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS versus Olympus 7040 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX200 IS and the 7040.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and 7040 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and 7040.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus 7040 to provide more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus 7040 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Stylus 7040 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
| Also called as | - | mju 7040 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 144 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $299 |