Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7726/a77266e16c8e817031df1e9ec6e12ac4a12ca9c5" alt="Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SX200 IS was manufactured 4 years prior to the TG-830 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the SX200 IS matches up versus the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
SX200 IS | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Canon SX200 IS
TG-830 iHS | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 44 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus TG-830 iHS
SX200 IS | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS features outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has proportions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SX200 IS versus the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6848f/6848f0ecf4cbc0e25999197015e18271abdd3fd7" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and TG-830 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4ba/bd4ba2bbd89e4ef2c5117c7ced883fa7f7b2addf" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f12e8/f12e860170f74ecd9c2f50e8510a7ad22c2d897a" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b5f/f7b5ff7a61ea6c6ecfa92dcbb109a2b3c2d77f32" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-5L | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $329 | $0 |