Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Newer Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was brought out 3 years prior to the VG-160 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX200 IS matches up versus the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus VG-160
| SX200 IS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Canon SX200 IS
| VG-160 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 32 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus VG-160
| SX200 IS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS has got outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the VG-160.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and VG-160 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and VG-160.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus VG-160 to show greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The older SX200 IS will be behind in sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $90 |