Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25
Portability
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
Panasonic ZS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS20
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS30
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and ZS25 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was revealed 4 years earlier than the ZS25 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the SX200 IS matches up against the ZS25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Panasonic ZS25
| SX200 IS | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Canon SX200 IS
| ZS25 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Panasonic ZS25
| SX200 IS | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS has got outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the ZS25.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and ZS25 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and ZS25.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Panasonic ZS25 to produce extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind in sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic ZS25 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX200 IS
Street photography with Panasonic ZS25
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (247g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus via touch
lighter than others (193 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Canon SX200 IS as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (260 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Travel photography advice
Panasonic ZS25 Travel photography advice
lighter than competitors (247 grams)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than others (193g)
provides focus via touch
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (480mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (260 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX200 IS
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS25
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery pack (260 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (247 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (193g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $329 | $300 |