Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7726/a77266e16c8e817031df1e9ec6e12ac4a12ca9c5" alt="Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f26/a0f260975b7fd3cfd965df18bc5d1244f1cf70fb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS45
- New Model is Panasonic ZS60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Canon SX200 IS versus Panasonic ZS50, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Panasonic. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the ZS50 (12MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SX200 IS was revealed 6 years before the ZS50 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX200 IS grades against the ZS50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Panasonic ZS50
SX200 IS | ZS50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Canon SX200 IS
ZS50 | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Panasonic ZS50
SX200 IS | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS features outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS50 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS versus Panasonic ZS50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the ZS50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/939a9/939a9ac57c977ed9f43cff90f5db53a15db10e05" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and ZS50 is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a761f/a761f12e077155868cf5259d9806707e3503a97e" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and ZS50.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of pictures although you should consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60485/604854dbd321de8d1b0a769c395ce521aba48a27" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59c0e/59c0e40d735788ca82bfcb5a30da4869241be2dc" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Panasonic |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-5L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $329 | $350 |