Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Pentax. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX200 IS was unveiled 21 months prior to the WG-1 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SX200 IS matches up against the WG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Pentax Optio WG-1. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Pentax WG-1
| SX200 IS | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Canon SX200 IS
| WG-1 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Pentax WG-1
| SX200 IS | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS features outside measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the WG-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and WG-1 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and WG-1.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Pentax WG-1 to offer extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2011-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 157 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $350 |