Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Canon SX200 IS versus Pentax WG-2, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX200 IS was manufactured 3 years before the WG-2 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX200 IS scores versus the WG-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Pentax Optio WG-2. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Pentax WG-2
| SX200 IS | WG-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Canon SX200 IS
| WG-2 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Pentax WG-2
| SX200 IS | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX200 IS versus Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS versus the WG-2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and WG-2 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and WG-2.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax WG-2 to offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $350 |