Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was introduced 5 years prior to the WG-3 GPS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SX200 IS scores against the WG-3 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SX200 IS | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Canon SX200 IS
| WG-3 GPS | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 | May 2009 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SX200 IS | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS features external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SX200 IS vs the WG-3 GPS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and WG-3 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and WG-3 GPS.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX200 IS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 238 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $350 |