Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is fairly comparable but the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.

The SX200 IS was launched 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX200 IS scores versus the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX200 IS | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX200 IS
GR Digital IV | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX200 IS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS has external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SX200 IS and the GR Digital IV.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and GR Digital IV is 90 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SX200 IS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Canon SX200 IS will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older SX200 IS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-5L | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $329 | $599 |