Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX200 IS was introduced 10 years prior to the GR III and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX200 IS matches up against the GR III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Ricoh GR III. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh GR III
| SX200 IS | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Canon SX200 IS
| GR III | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | May 2009 | More recent by 114 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh GR III
| SX200 IS | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS features outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX200 IS and the GR III.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and GR III is 90 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and GR III.
As you can see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SX200 IS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR III will resolve greater detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh GR III |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $329 | $900 |