Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Newer Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon SX200 IS versus Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX200 IS was released 9 years prior to the WG-50 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the SX200 IS matches up versus the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh WG-50
| SX200 IS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Canon SX200 IS
| WG-50 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 97 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-50
| SX200 IS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS versus Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SX200 IS and the WG-50.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The image underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and WG-50.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $329 | $280 |