Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX200 IS was launched 9 years earlier than the WG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the SX200 IS scores vs the WG-6 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh WG-6
| SX200 IS | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Canon SX200 IS
| WG-6 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 106 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-6
| SX200 IS | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS provides outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS versus the WG-6.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and WG-6 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The pic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and WG-6.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-6 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 246 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $329 | $271 |