Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Canon SX200 IS versus Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was revealed 11 years before the WG-70 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SX200 IS matches up against the WG-70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh WG-70
| SX200 IS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Canon SX200 IS
| WG-70 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 130 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-70
| SX200 IS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS features external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon SX200 IS versus Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX200 IS against the WG-70.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and WG-70 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and WG-70.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $329 | $280 |