Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SX200 IS scores against the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh WG-M1
SX200 IS | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX200 IS
WG-M1 | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | May 2009 | Newer by 64 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-M1
SX200 IS | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS features physical dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS and the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and WG-M1.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.5" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-5L | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $329 | $2,000 |