Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here, we are comparing the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was unveiled 5 years before the WB35F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX200 IS matches up against the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Samsung WB35F
| SX200 IS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Canon SX200 IS
| WB35F | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung WB35F
| SX200 IS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS has got external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the WB35F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to produce greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $329 | $130 |