Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Sigma. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly well matched but the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was announced 3 years before the DP1 Merrill which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX200 IS scores versus the DP1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| SX200 IS | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Canon SX200 IS
| DP1 Merrill | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 | May 2009 | More modern by 33 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| SX200 IS | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS has outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the DP1 Merrill.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and DP1 Merrill is 90 and 82 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The pic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and DP1 Merrill.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SX200 IS having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will give more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sigma |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $1,250 |