Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Older Model is Sigma SD9
- Refreshed by Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Canon SX200 IS versus Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Canon and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX200 IS was released 5 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the SX200 IS matches up versus the SD10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Sigma SD10. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sigma SD10
| SX200 IS | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 | March 2004 | Fresher by 63 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Canon SX200 IS
| SD10 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma SD10
| SX200 IS | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS provides outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX200 IS versus Sigma SD10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX200 IS against the SD10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and SD10 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and SD10.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX200 IS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Canon SX200 IS will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer SX200 IS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Sigma |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma SD10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 3MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $198 |