Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
84 Imaging
74 Features
79 Overall
76
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Newer Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma fp, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Canon and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX200 IS was announced 11 years before the fp which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the SX200 IS scores versus the fp in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Sigma fp. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sigma fp
| SX200 IS | fp |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Canon SX200 IS
| fp | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2019 | May 2009 | Newer by 123 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 2100k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1870k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma fp
| SX200 IS | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS comes with external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma fp in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the SX200 IS and the fp.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and fp is 90 and 84 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and fp.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX200 IS with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma fp will provide you with more detail with its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sigma |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma fp |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2019-07-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Leica L |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 422 gr (0.93 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $329 | $2,050 |