Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Canon SX200 IS and Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by brands Canon and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX200 IS was revealed 6 years earlier than the QX1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SX200 IS grades vs the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Sony Alpha QX1. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sony QX1
| SX200 IS | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Canon SX200 IS
| QX1 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | May 2009 | More modern by 64 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sony QX1
| SX200 IS | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS and Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX200 IS vs the QX1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and QX1 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and QX1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SX200 IS with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sony QX1 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 216 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $500 |