Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Later Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX200 IS was brought out 7 years before the RX10 III and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SX200 IS scores versus the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sony RX10 III
SX200 IS | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Canon SX200 IS
RX10 III | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2016 | May 2009 | More recent by 83 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III
SX200 IS | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS features physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS against the RX10 III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and RX10 III.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SX200 IS due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 III will offer you greater detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 1051 gr (2.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-5L | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $329 | $1,398 |