Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
90
Imaging
34
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Later Model is Canon SX210 IS
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Revealed March 2016
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX200 IS was brought out 7 years before the RX10 III and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SX200 IS scores versus the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sony RX10 III

 SX200 IS RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Canon SX200 IS

 RX10 III SX200 IS 
RevealedMarch 2016May 2009More recent by 83 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1229k230kSharper screen (+999k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III

 SX200 IS RX10 III 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS features physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Look at the Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS against the RX10 III.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and RX10 III.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SX200 IS due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 III will offer you greater detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX200 IS
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
28
has manual focus
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
71
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
provides face detect focus
supports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Street photography features
Sony RX10 III Street photography features
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (247 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
64
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
supports RAW files
environment sealing
heavier than others (1,051g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Sports photography factors
Sony RX10 III Sports photography factors
27
image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (420 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Travel photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Travel photography highlights
62
lighter than average in class (247g)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
very long reach (336mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
55
better than average battery pack (420 CIPA)
environment sealing
good resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others (1,051 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX200 IS
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 III
42
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
63
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
supports RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (420 CIPA)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX200 IS
Vlogging with Sony RX10 III
29
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (247 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
28
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has mic socket
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
does not offer selfie friendly display
heavier than others (1,051 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX200 IS vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Sony RX10 III
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Name Canon Sony
Model Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-05-14 2016-03-29
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-336mm (12.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Max aperture f/3.4-5.3 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range 0cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247 gr (0.54 lbs) 1051 gr (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model NB-5L NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $329 $1,398