Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900
90 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 220g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched June 2010
- Older Model is Canon SX200 IS
- Successor is Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Nikon. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the SX210 IS (14MP) and A900 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX210 IS was revealed 6 years before the A900 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the SX210 IS grades against the A900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX210 IS & Nikon Coolpix A900. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX210 IS Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX210 IS over the Nikon A900
| SX210 IS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Canon SX210 IS
| A900 | SX210 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 69 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX210 IS and Nikon A900
| SX210 IS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Canon SX210 IS has got outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 220 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has specifications of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SX210 IS versus the A900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX210 IS and A900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX210 IS and A900.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon A900 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SX210 IS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 220g (0.49 lbs) | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $226 | $400 |