Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c
90 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 220g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released June 2010
- Older Model is Canon SX200 IS
- Successor is Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Announced February 2013
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Canon SX210 IS versus Nikon S800c, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Nikon. The image resolution of the SX210 IS (14MP) and the S800c (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX210 IS was introduced 3 years earlier than the S800c which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SX210 IS matches up vs the S800c in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX210 IS & Nikon Coolpix S800c. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX210 IS Gallery & Nikon S800c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX210 IS over the Nikon S800c
SX210 IS | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Canon SX210 IS
S800c | SX210 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 32 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 819k | 230k | Crisper screen (+589k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX210 IS and Nikon S800c
SX210 IS | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX210 IS enjoys exterior dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 220 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon S800c has specifications of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX210 IS versus Nikon S800c in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SX210 IS versus the S800c.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX210 IS and S800c is 90 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX210 IS and S800c.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S800c to result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged SX210 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX210 IS vs Nikon S800c Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Nikon Coolpix S800c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Nikon Coolpix S800c |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2013-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 819k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 220g (0.49 lb) | 184g (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 140 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-5L | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $226 | $290 |