Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
90 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
90 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 220g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched June 2010
- Earlier Model is Canon SX200 IS
- Replacement is Canon SX230 HS
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX210 IS (14MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX210 IS was announced 4 years prior to the TG-3 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX210 IS grades vs the TG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX210 IS & Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX210 IS Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX210 IS over the Olympus TG-3
| SX210 IS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Canon SX210 IS
| TG-3 | SX210 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 46 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX210 IS and Olympus TG-3
| SX210 IS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX210 IS has outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 220 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX210 IS compared to the TG-3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX210 IS and TG-3 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX210 IS and TG-3.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to deliver extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SX210 IS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX210 IS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-3
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Canon SX210 IS Street photography advice
Olympus TG-3 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (220 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competitors (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon SX210 IS Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography advice
long zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
great battery pack (330 per charge)
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX210 IS
Travel photography with Olympus TG-3
lighter than average in class (220g)
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
long zoom (392mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
great battery pack (330 shots)
environment proof
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX210 IS Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
quite wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
environment proof
great battery pack (330 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX210 IS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (220 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
quite wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 220 grams (0.49 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $226 | $350 |
