Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II
90 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96e37/96e372175208b892fbb76603dcff599cab246954" alt="Canon PowerShot SX210 IS front Canon PowerShot SX210 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 220g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Older Model is Canon SX200 IS
- Updated by Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon SX210 IS versus Ricoh GR II, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX210 IS (14MP) and the GR II (16MP) is relatively well matched but the SX210 IS (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX210 IS was launched 6 years earlier than the GR II which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX210 IS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SX210 IS grades versus the GR II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX210 IS & Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX210 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX210 IS over the Ricoh GR II
SX210 IS | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Canon SX210 IS
GR II | SX210 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 60 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX210 IS and Ricoh GR II
SX210 IS | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX210 IS offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 220 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX210 IS versus Ricoh GR II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX210 IS compared to the GR II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f299c/f299c48db6269bf57bf567e3462ca57cf1b5ab7f" alt="Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II size comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX210 IS and GR II is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49bcb/49bcbaf4bc84f845861d7b0f823022f8789877cc" alt="Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX210 IS and GR II.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX210 IS because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GR II will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged SX210 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b0a8/9b0a811881249877cf6e40a634460f363b818924" alt="Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison"
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/570f7/570f72a7ce320accf3cfa4a87169bf6dcb8c8d9b" alt="Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Ricoh GR II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 220 gr (0.49 pounds) | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-5L | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $226 | $599 |