Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
- Replaced the Canon SX210 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX240 HS
Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Canon SX230 HS versus Casio EX-FC150, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the EX-FC150 (10MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX230 HS was launched 21 months after the EX-FC150 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SX230 HS grades against the EX-FC150 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Casio Exilim EX-FC150. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Casio EX-FC150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Casio EX-FC150
| SX230 HS | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Canon SX230 HS
| EX-FC150 | SX230 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Casio EX-FC150
| SX230 HS | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX230 HS provides external dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-FC150 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX230 HS versus Casio EX-FC150 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the SX230 HS vs the EX-FC150.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX230 HS and EX-FC150 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The picture here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX230 HS and EX-FC150.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon SX230 HS to show greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The newer SX230 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Portrait photography information
Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
has face detection focus
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX230 HS
Street photography with Casio EX-FC150
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (223g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography details
Casio EX-FC150 Sports photography details
long zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (210 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
high max fps (40.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX230 HS
Travel photography with Casio EX-FC150
lighter than average in class (223 grams)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
great zoom (392mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (210 shots)
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.6)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Landscape photography advice
Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery pack (210 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
focusing manually
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.6)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Vlogging factors
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging factors
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (223g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.6)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
Photography Glossary
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-FC150 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2009-11-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 37-185mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.6-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 40.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 2.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223 gr (0.49 lb) | 173 gr (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | NP-40 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $399 | $350 |
