Clicky

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs

Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Replaced the Canon SX210 IS
  • Later Model is Canon SX240 HS
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Canon SX230 HS versus Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the SX230 HS (12MP) and Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SX230 HS was introduced 3 years prior to the Fujifilm S9400W which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX230 HS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SX230 HS matches up vs the Fujifilm S9400W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Fujifilm S9400W

 SX230 HS Fujifilm S9400W 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen resolution461k460kClearer screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Canon SX230 HS

 Fujifilm S9400W SX230 HS 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2011Newer by 30 months

Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Fujifilm S9400W

 SX230 HS Fujifilm S9400W 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX230 HS has exterior measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9400W has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX230 HS versus Fujifilm S9400W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the SX230 HS versus the Fujifilm S9400W.

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX230 HS and Fujifilm S9400W is 91 and 61 respectively.

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX230 HS and Fujifilm S9400W.

As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to deliver more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged SX230 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX230 HS Portrait photography highlights
Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography highlights
34
manual focus
includes face detection focus
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
37
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX230 HS
Street photography with Fujifilm S9400W
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (223 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than others in class (670 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon SX230 HS Sports photography advice
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography advice
36
incredible zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery power (210 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
great battery (500 shots)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX230 HS
Travel photography with Fujifilm S9400W
61
lighter than average (223 grams)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
great zoom (392mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (210 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
54
great battery (500 CIPA)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (670g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX230 HS
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
41
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery power (210 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse mode
44
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
great battery (500 shots)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX230 HS Vlogging highlights
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging highlights
34
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (223 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic port
26
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic support
heavier than others in class (670g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX230 HS vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX230 HS and Fujifilm S9400W
 Canon PowerShot SX230 HSFujifilm FinePix S9400W
General Information
Brand Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-07-19 2014-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology PureColor II TG TFT LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 97%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/1700 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 7.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 223 gr (0.49 lbs) 670 gr (1.48 lbs)
Dimensions 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures 500 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack AA
Battery model NB-5L 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $399 $330