Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
- Replaced the Canon SX210 IS
- Later Model is Canon SX240 HS
Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 7040
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX230 HS versus Olympus 7040, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the 7040 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX230 HS was manufactured 19 months later than the 7040 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX230 HS matches up against the 7040 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Olympus Stylus 7040. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Olympus 7040 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Olympus 7040
| SX230 HS | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 19 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Canon SX230 HS
| 7040 | SX230 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Olympus 7040
| SX230 HS | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX230 HS has got external dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus 7040 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX230 HS versus Olympus 7040 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX230 HS compared to the 7040.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX230 HS and 7040 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX230 HS and 7040.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus 7040 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The newer SX230 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX230 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus 7040
focusing manually
offers face detect focus
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Street photography information
Olympus 7040 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (223 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 7040 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery power (210 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Travel photography features
Olympus 7040 Travel photography features
lighter than average in class (223 grams)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
great zoom (392mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low battery power (210 shots)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Landscape photography advice
Olympus 7040 Landscape photography advice
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery power (210 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX230 HS
Vlogging with Olympus 7040
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (223g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus 7040 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Olympus Stylus 7040 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 7040 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223 grams (0.49 lb) | 144 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $299 |
