Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
- Old Model is Canon SX210 IS
- Updated by Canon SX240 HS
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Canon SX230 HS versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX230 HS was announced 5 months before the TG-320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the SX230 HS grades vs the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Olympus TG-320
| SX230 HS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon SX230 HS
| TG-320 | SX230 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Olympus TG-320
| SX230 HS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | January 2012 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX230 HS enjoys physical measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX230 HS versus Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX230 HS against the TG-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX230 HS and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX230 HS and TG-320.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-320 to produce more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX230 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
focusing manually
has face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Street photography information
Olympus TG-320 Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (223g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography information
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography information
incredible zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (210 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (150 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Travel photography features
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography features
lighter than average (223 grams)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (392mm)
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery life (210 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (150 shots)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery life (210 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery life (150 per charge)
does not have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Vlogging information
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging information
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (223 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223g (0.49 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 150 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $399 | $0 |