Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replaced the Canon SX210 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX240 HS
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon SX230 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX230 HS was revealed 6 months prior to the TG-820 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX230 HS scores against the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX230 HS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon SX230 HS
| TG-820 iHS | SX230 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+569k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX230 HS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | February 2012 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon SX230 HS comes with external measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Canon SX230 HS and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX230 HS and the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX230 HS and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX230 HS and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures although you might want to take the age of the products into consideration.
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX230 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
has face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
provides face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (223g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography information
excellent zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (210 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (220 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Travel photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography info
lighter than competitors (223 grams)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
great zoom (392mm)
no Timelapse function
not so great battery (210 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
weather proofing
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery (220 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX230 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery (210 shots)
no Timelapse function
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery (220 shots)
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (223g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no microphone support
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone socket
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon SX230 HS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 223g (0.49 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 220 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $500 |
