Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
- Replaced the Canon SX210 IS
- Later Model is Canon SX240 HS
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX230 HS versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the SX230 HS (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX230 HS was manufactured 9 years before the WG-70 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX230 HS scores against the WG-70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX230 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Ricoh WG-70
| SX230 HS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Canon SX230 HS
| WG-70 | SX230 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 104 months |
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Ricoh WG-70
| SX230 HS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX230 HS enjoys physical measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon SX230 HS versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX230 HS compared to the WG-70.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX230 HS and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX230 HS and WG-70.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older SX230 HS will be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX230 HS
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-70
has manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detect focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (223g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography details
excellent zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (210 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather proof
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX230 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-70
lighter than competition (223 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
great reach (392mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery (210 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
weather proof
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery (210 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16MP)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging highlights
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (223 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
missing mic port
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223 grams (0.49 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $280 |