Clicky

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Old Model is Canon SX210 IS
  • New Model is Canon SX240 HS
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Canon SX230 HS and Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SX230 HS (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX230 HS was manufactured 7 months later than the ST95 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX230 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SX230 HS scores vs the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Samsung ST95

 SX230 HS ST95 
LaunchedJuly 2011January 2011Fresher by 7 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen resolution461k460kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Canon SX230 HS

 ST95 SX230 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Samsung ST95

 SX230 HS ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX230 HS features outside dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Examine the Canon SX230 HS and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the SX230 HS and the ST95.

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX230 HS and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX230 HS and ST95.

As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung ST95 to give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher SX230 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX230 HS
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
34
you can focus manually
provides face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
29
good resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon SX230 HS Street photography info
Samsung ST95 Street photography info
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (223 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
50
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
max ISO too low (0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon SX230 HS as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Sports photography camera
36
amazing zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (210 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
good resolution (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon SX230 HS Travel photography factors
Samsung ST95 Travel photography factors
61
lighter than average (223 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (392mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (210 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
71
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
very good max aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX230 HS
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
41
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery pack (210 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
37
very good max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
has no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX230 HS Vlogging highlights
Samsung ST95 Vlogging highlights
34
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (223g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
27
very good max aperture (f)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX230 HS and Samsung ST95
 Canon PowerShot SX230 HSSamsung ST95
General Information
Company Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Samsung ST95
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-07-19 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech PureColor II TG TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 223g (0.49 pounds) -
Dimensions 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-5L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $399 $145