Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Succeeded the Canon SX210 IS
- Refreshed by Canon SX240 HS
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX230 HS versus Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX230 HS was launched 5 months prior to the WB150F so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the SX230 HS scores against the WB150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS and Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX230 HS Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Samsung WB150F
| SX230 HS | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Canon SX230 HS
| WB150F | SX230 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Samsung WB150F
| SX230 HS | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2012 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX230 HS offers outside measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX230 HS versus Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX230 HS versus the WB150F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX230 HS and WB150F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX230 HS and WB150F.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB150F to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography factors
manual focus
comes with face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Street photography factors
Samsung WB150F Street photography factors
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (223g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (188g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Sports photography highlights
excellent zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Travel photography advice
Samsung WB150F Travel photography advice
lighter than others (223g)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long reach (392mm)
no Time Lapse function
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lighter than competitors (188 grams)
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (432mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX230 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Vlogging advice
Samsung WB150F Vlogging advice
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (223g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors (188g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 223 gr (0.49 lb) | 188 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $399 | $230 |