Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Succeeded the Canon SX210 IS
- Successor is Canon SX240 HS
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SX230 HS (12MP) and H400 (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX230 HS was announced 3 years before the H400 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX230 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the SX230 HS grades versus the H400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Sony H400
| SX230 HS | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Canon SX230 HS
| H400 | SX230 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 31 months |
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Sony H400
| SX230 HS | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX230 HS offers exterior dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony H400 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SX230 HS vs the H400.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX230 HS and H400 is 91 and 62 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX230 HS and H400.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony H400 to deliver extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older SX230 HS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Portrait photography information
Sony H400 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
comes with face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Street photography highlights
Sony H400 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (223g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography advice
Sony H400 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has tracking focus
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Travel photography info
Sony H400 Travel photography info
lighter than competition in class (223g)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (392mm)
missing Time Lapse function
not so great battery pack (210 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (1550mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (628g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX230 HS
Landscape photography with Sony H400
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX230 HS as a Vlogging camera
Sony H400 as a Vlogging camera
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (223g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic port
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
does have microphone support
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX230 HS vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 223g (0.49 lb) | 628g (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $268 |