Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Older Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the EX-G1 (12MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX240 HS was unveiled 2 years later than the EX-G1 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SX240 HS scores against the EX-G1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Casio Exilim EX-G1. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Casio EX-G1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Casio EX-G1
| SX240 HS | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Canon SX240 HS
| EX-G1 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-G1
| SX240 HS | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS features outer measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-G1 has dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX240 HS versus the EX-G1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and EX-G1 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The visual here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and EX-G1.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels so you should expect similar quality of images although you will need to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern SX240 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-G1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2009-11-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 154g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-800 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $61 |