Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX230 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX260 HS
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Canon and Casio. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and EX-ZR1000 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX240 HS was brought out 7 months before the EX-ZR1000 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the EX-ZR1000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| SX240 HS | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Canon SX240 HS
| EX-ZR1000 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2012 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 7 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-ZR1000
| SX240 HS | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR1000 has proportions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SX240 HS and the EX-ZR1000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and EX-ZR1000 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and EX-ZR1000.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR1000 to give extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older SX240 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography info
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography info
focusing manually
supports face detect autofocus
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features face detection focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography details
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography details
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (224 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (255g)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Sports photography camera
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (230 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
great battery power (470 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX240 HS
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
lighter than competition (224 grams)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (230 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition (255 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX240 HS
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery pack (230 shots)
missing Timelapse mode
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
great battery power (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging factors
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging factors
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (224g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing microphone jack
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (255 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2012-09-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) | 255 grams (0.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photos | 470 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $572 |