Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Earlier Model is Canon SX230 HS
- New Model is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced July 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX240 HS was released 2 years later than the Fujifilm Z35 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the Fujifilm Z35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Fujifilm FinePix Z35. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Fujifilm Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Fujifilm Z35
| SX240 HS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Canon SX240 HS
| Fujifilm Z35 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Fujifilm Z35
| SX240 HS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys outside measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Z35 has proportions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SX240 HS vs the Fujifilm Z35.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and Fujifilm Z35 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and Fujifilm Z35.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Canon SX240 HS to give more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more modern SX240 HS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 3 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $130 |