Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
 
               
              69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Here, we are comparing the Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX240 HS was manufactured 2 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the SP-800 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| SX240 HS | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 25 months | 
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) | 
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Canon SX240 HS
| SP-800 UZ | SX240 HS | 
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| SX240 HS | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display | 
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size | 
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display | 
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys physical measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SX240 HS against the SP-800 UZ.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and SP-800 UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.
 
          Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and SP-800 UZ.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus SP-800 UZ to give you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger SX240 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
 
          Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus | 
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus SP-800 UZ | 
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom | 
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2010-02-02 | 
| Physical type | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | TruePic III | 
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - | 
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 | 
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 | 
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 143 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.6 | 
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches | 
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 12 secs | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs | 
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - | 
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m | 
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 | 
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 | 
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - | 
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - | 
| Battery model | NB-6L | Li-50B | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal | 
| Card slots | Single | Single | 
| Cost at release | $0 | $270 | 


