Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced February 2012
- Older Model is Canon SX230 HS
- New Model is Canon SX260 HS
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus 9000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX240 HS was revealed 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SX240 HS scores vs the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus 9000
| SX240 HS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon SX240 HS
| 9000 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus 9000
| SX240 HS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX240 HS offers external measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX240 HS vs the 9000.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and 9000.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP and you can expect similar quality of photographs although you might want to take the age of the products into consideration. The fresher SX240 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography advice
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
includes face detection focus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography features
Olympus 9000 Street photography features
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (224 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition (225 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography details
Olympus 9000 Sports photography details
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (230 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Travel photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (224 grams)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery life (230 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (225 grams)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography info
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography info
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
not so great battery life (230 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (224g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic socket
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (225 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $300 |