Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX230 HS
- Updated by Canon SX260 HS
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX240 HS was released 5 years earlier than the SH-3 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX240 HS scores versus the SH-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus SH-3
| SX240 HS | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Canon SX240 HS
| SH-3 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 48 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus SH-3
| SX240 HS | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS provides external measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX240 HS compared to the SH-3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and SH-3 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX240 HS and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus SH-3 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged SX240 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography information
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography information
focusing manually
offers face detect autofocus
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX240 HS
Street photography with Olympus SH-3
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (224 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
provides touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (271g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography features
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography features
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
slow fps (2.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (230 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery power (380 shots)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography highlights
lighter than others (224g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (230 shots)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery power (380 shots)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
provides touch to focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography info
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography info
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery power (230 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
great battery power (380 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging factors
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging factors
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (224 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
missing mic support
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 11.5 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $579 |