Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a70d/9a70daa5e19eaa038ef747e5f40274a4f27f1719" alt="Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX230 HS
- New Model is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SX240 HS was brought out 2 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the SX240 HS matches up versus the Tough-3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus Tough-3000
SX240 HS | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 26 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon SX240 HS
Tough-3000 | SX240 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus Tough-3000
SX240 HS | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS provides external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the SX240 HS vs the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c24b/1c24b38bcfdbef7c8c6fa46e8a71ddfcbf1b6ce3" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and Tough-3000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb5a/7bb5a21777577b0c8b058d8cbe71cba59efa26d1" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and Tough-3000.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos however you will want to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent SX240 HS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9544/e95447cccde2d8f5664c37c9daadc8c3c76a2e6b" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ca80/3ca80435c4a1b9dec33dcb921ec77230c84c70e3" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $0 |