Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced February 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX230 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX240 HS was introduced 16 months prior to the TG-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SX240 HS matches up versus the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SX240 HS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Canon SX240 HS
| TG-2 iHS | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 16 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SX240 HS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS provides outside dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the SX240 HS and the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and TG-2 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The image below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of pictures but you should really factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged SX240 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-2 iHS Portrait photography info
focusing manually
offers face detection focusing
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
includes face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography information
Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography information
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (224g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (230 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
great battery (350 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography advice
lighter than competition (224g)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (230 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery (350 CIPA)
environment proof
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX240 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
terrible battery (230 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
great battery (350 per charge)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (224 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | 350 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $380 |