Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Updated by Canon SX260 HS
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX240 HS was unveiled 3 years before the TG-3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SX240 HS matches up versus the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus TG-3
| SX240 HS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Canon SX240 HS
| TG-3 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-3
| SX240 HS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS has got exterior measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SX240 HS vs the TG-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and TG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to give you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged SX240 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
offers face detection focus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX240 HS
Street photography with Olympus TG-3
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (224 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition in class (247g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (230 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
better than average battery (330 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography details
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography details
lighter than competitors (224g)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery power (230 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery (330 shots)
weather proof
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition in class (247g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery power (230 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
better than average battery (330 per charge)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (224 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
missing mic jack
heavier than competition in class (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $350 |